Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Dr Danny's column >>

DR DANNY

Articles Posted: 54  Links Seeded: 714
Member Since: 7/2007  Last Seen: 4/20/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Obama's Three Clichés

Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:57 PM EST
politics, barack-obama, democrat, change, 2008-election, speech, hope, election-08, unity, cliche, buzzword
By Dr Danny

The great uniter, champion of hope and vehicle for change? Or just a bunch of clichés?

Advertise | AdChoices

Barack Obama has been crowned the king of all orators and the man that can inspire with his speeches among media elites. These speeches have a common theme: they are riddled with three now-cliché words: Change, Unity and Hope. They are not just stand-alone clichés, they depend upon each other. It is clear to see these have become just empty buzzwords to draw some cheers.

Change

During the recent Nevada Democrat debate, Obama mentioned change 15 times in the 28 responses he gave, just over once every two answers. He particularly emphasised that his win in Iowa was because he could deliver the kind of "change" that Americans were looking for. Exactly how he would achieve this change, however, still remains a bit of a mystery.

In his victory speech in South Carolina, Barack Obama said the word "change" almost once every minute. "We are hungry for change", "change we seek will not come easy", "we are looking for more than just a change of party in the White House. We're looking to fundamentally change the status quo in Washington". If Obama was hungry for change, why has he not introduced legislation in the Senate to kick-start that change? He says he wants to fundamentally change the status quo in Washington desptie being a part of, and maintaining, that status quo.

Certainly the change will not come easy, but you can always have hope, right?

Hope

"That change will take time. There will be setbacks, and false starts, and sometimes we will make mistakes. But as hard as it may seem, we cannot lose hope."

Indeed, when change does not come easy, hope is your friend.

During his speech on Martin Luther King Day, Omaba said, "And if enough of our voices join together; we can bring those walls tumbling down. The walls of Jericho can finally come tumbling down. That is our hope – but only if we pray together, and work together, and march together." Remember folks, hope requires us to "join together" to bring those walls tumbling down. What's required is unity.

Unity

"Unity is the great need of the hour – the great need of this hour. Not because it sounds pleasant or because it makes us feel good, but because it's the only way we can overcome the essential deficit that exists in this country.

Those 'deficits' include "when there is Scooter Libby justice for some and Jena justice for others". What about Bill Clinton justice for some and OJ Simpson justice for others?

Obama goes on to say, "But of course, true unity cannot be so easily won. It starts with a change in attitudes." So there it is, in full circle: Change requires hope, hope requires unity and unity requires change. Without any one of those you can't have the others, and without any one of them you can't have an Obama speech.

I still have hope that Obama's partisanship clouded in calls for unity can lead to a change in approach from buzzwords and clichés towards some policies that can unite us and give us hope for how he'd change Washington. Right now, actions speak louder than words, and the silence is deafening.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Dr Danny's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Newsvine Election Coverage, Political Analysis, The Big 2008 Election
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (11)
Partisan Hack

Obama does need to come up with some new substance, but as cliches go, you could do far worse. They're the three things that people probably yearn for most in America.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:05 PM EST
Dr Danny

That's very much true at the moment. He can certainly unite Democrats by talking for a change of direction of the current White House administration, but his speeches have been very policy-lite. I imagine, if successful in gaining the Democrat nomination, that's when the real scrutiny will begin and he won't be able to get away with a speech revolving around these three clichés.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:16 PM EST
Partisan Hack

His policies are actually fairly Clinton-esque - friendly to corporations in some ways, at least with health care. But that may be what's needed in the general election.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:19 PM EST
Reply
Dr Danny

There may come a time when people will get tired with these three already over-used buzzwords. Obama may really require change then and perhaps address his lack of experience.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:06 PM EST
Larry H-189743

If you read Senator Obama's policy platform on his website there is a lot of pandering for votes, too much demagoguery, and some sketchy outlines of policy statements.

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:44 PM EST
Bill Harrison

The best thing about Obama is that he's not a Clinton. He's gone from an obscure IL state senator to a possible Democratic candidate for president in the space of less than four years. None of this would have been possible in the pre-internet, pre-cable yackfest years.

  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:57 PM EST
Reply
SuperUnspecial

Those 'deficits' include "when there is Scooter Libby justice for some and Jena justice for others". What about Bill Clinton justice for some and OJ Simpson justice for others?

I assume that Bill Clinton justice refers to the witch hunt he underwent...it is unfortunate that politicians don't get off easy for superficial scandals...only for real corruption.

Still, OJ Simpson must be understood in context. It was the culmination of about 50 years of a one way justice system in LA, it was one event of "Black on White" crime that went unpunished after uncountable instances of "White on Black" crime that involved systematic extortion, oppression and murder that went unpunished where even the hint of "Black on White" or any sort of Black crime received the harshest punishments imaginable. And it remains one anomaly in over 60 years that was still more about wealth than race.

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:45 PM EST
Partisan Hack

And it remains one anomaly in over 60 years that was still more about wealth than race.

Exactly. If you're rich, all is forgiven. Money talks and evil walks.

    #4.1 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:02 PM EST
    Reply
    beaglebeatExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    Dr. Danny? Doctor in what? Bigotry? What is the message you are trying to send with a photo of chimp on your site and commenting on Obama's presidential campaign? You are a conservative with questionable sense. The sense of a "swiftboater."

    • 1 vote
    Reply#5 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:04 PM EST
    backroads

    Why so fussy? I wish Obama would expand his vocabulary. Has he said "surge" yet?

    • 2 votes
    #5.1 - Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:29 PM EST
    Dr Danny

    JustJim,

    Dr. Danny? Doctor in what? Bigotry?

    I often find the people calling others bigots are in fact bigots themselves. There's nothing bigotry in what I wrote. I merely analysed his speeches, which the media have hailed as fantastic, and found a common, rather empty theme. I notice that you haven't attempted to debate what I've written, you instead have tried to debate my character. I therefore thank you for unwittingly admitting that my article has some truth to it.

    What is the message you are trying to send with a photo of chimp on your site and commenting on Obama's presidential campaign?

    My icon, a photo of a chimp, was in place months before I ever wrote an article about Obama. The reason I have it is because someone had it as a profile picture on Facebook, I thought it was amusing and copied them. Now you're the one that drew reference to Obama with it. Check out the rest of my column. There's not a whole lot about Obama on it.

    You are a conservative with questionable sense. The sense of a "swiftboater."

    I won't retaliate to your personal attacks. Thanks for viewing my article though.

    • 3 votes
    #5.2 - Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:27 AM EST
    Reply
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com